I don’t think I have the equipment for this, but I’d be cool to get the response curve for how my Lux/Cin receiver responds to the concentration of 3-oxo-C6-HSL and 3-OH-C14-HSL. In the thesis and papers, they used YFP as a reporter, and measured how much it glowed with a flow cytometer.
I’m hoping that my receiver cells will be able to directly detect the 3-oxo and 3-OH that’s produced. If not, I would like to run the supernatant in a mass spectrometer to see if the cells are actually producing those signalling molecules.
eGFP sequence is:
VSKGEELFTG VVPILVELDG DVNGHKFSVS GEGEGDATYG KLTLKFICTT GKLPVPWPTL
VTTLTYGVQC FSRYPDHMKQ HDFFKSAMPE GYVQERTIFF KDDGNYKTRA EVKFEGDTLV
NRIELKGIDF KEDGNILGHK LEYNYNSHNV YIMADKQKNG IKVNFKIRHN IEDGSVQLAD
HYQQNTPIGD GPVLLPDNHY LSTQSALSKD PNEKRDHMVL LEFVTAAGIT LGMDELYKLE
HHHHHH
Via online calculator, expected average molecular weight is 27875.41.

Let’s pick adjacent peaks at 824.1148 and 849.0598.
m/z_{n+1} = 824.1148
m/z_{n} = 849.0598
(m/z_{n+1} - 1) / (m/z_{n} - m/z_{n+1}) = 32.997 => 33 charges on z_{n}
So m/33 = 849.0598
Calculated m = 28018.9734.
Accuracy: (experimental − theoretical) / theoretical = 5150 parts per million.
Hm, that’s off by more than I expected.
Using another pair of peaks: 1000.4947 and 1037.4927: 27 charges. m = 28012.3029. Still too high.